But perhaps it is no more bizarre than dropping aid into war
zones to keep folk alive so that they can carry on being – er – killed.
I’m talking about chemical weapons and how suddenly there is
that global moral line in the sand. Lots of brouhaha and firm chins and sage
nodding like we can all see just how reasonable it is to single out that one way of slaughtering innocent people
as B>A>D. Carnage by chemicals just aint on. Does that mean that blasting
body parts all over a town with high explosives IS? ‘Collateral damage’ from
drone attacks we know is just fine and dandy – cos America
does it (Pakistan ).
Rogue soldiers going on the rampage and blasting away the lives of innocent
villagers is not good but it happens (Afghanistan ). Not to mention
horrible deaths by the deadly diseases that creep in when infrastructure is
decimated or sectarian killings that erupt when political situations are
destabilised by war. Torture, rape, murder we understand are the predictable
side salads to almost every serious dish of conflict in history.
There are whole conferences at international level about how
to conduct war and how to treat the victims but the most bizarre element is
that some ways of slaughtering seem to pass muster by default and others don’t.
If you have spent time with children you will be aware that
there comes an age when they start asking those slightly surreal questions –
‘If you had to eat a live slug or a dead wasp – which would
it be?’
‘Would you rather be deaf or blind?’
‘Would you rather drown or suffocate?’
The answer to all is, frankly –‘neither thanks very much’
Even on the issue of chemical destruction of human lives,
have we been consistent? If – let’s say – it’s Bhopal
(India
1984) – then it’s more – ‘ooh shit – that was nasty but – hey ho – the company
isn’t really trading any more – so – wow – well – who woulda thunk’.
Yes chemical weapons are absolutely unacceptable but do any
parents want their kids dead in cross fire? No child wants to watch a parent’s
life leaking away because the local hospital has been bombed. No grandparent
wants to be parenting traumatised grandchildren whose father and mother have
been dragged off in the night, their dismembered bodies found floating down the
river the following day.
And where do the chemicals come from that make up the deadly
cocktails used in such hellish weaponry? Well – like a lot of the other nasties
that end up in conflicts nice and far away – they often come from U.S and
European linked companies.
So, trying to see through the fog of righteous outrage
that’s hovering round the global powers like mustard gas – couldn’t we just
clear the air and get a bit more indignant about war in general?